In 2010, I somewhat reluctantly attended a seminar on the topic of how judges should plan for and cope with their inevitable mandatory retirement upon reaching the age of seventy-five. Thankfully, it was the beginning of planning for a new professional approach for myself.
For some of my fellow judges, retirement was welcome, but for others like myself, it was not desired. I had spent over forty years on the Bench and I appreciated the challenges of being a judge specializing in family law.
With my colleagues on the Family Law Bench and Bar we had lived through major changes in family law including the development of the Unified Family Court which presently serves about forty percent of the population in Ontario. I believe that there are plans to further extend this Court to most, it not all, of the province.
One of the important procedural rules first implemented in the Unified Family Court in 1977 was the requirement of case management with judicial involvement in settlement conferences involving the parties and their counsel. However successful this process has been, I had always been concerned that this process does not allow judges enough time to deal with complex issues as they try to assist parties to work out reasonable settlements. There has always been a lack of judicial complement to satisfactorily complete this pre-trial settlement process, which can take several hours for each difficult case.
At the retirement conference, the discussions led by the speakers indicated that in order to adjust well to my retirement, it was important to work out a plan ahead of time. After giving it some thought, I decided that I would try to build up a modest mediation practice using the settlement techniques that I had learned on the Bench.
My first steps toward becoming a mediator were to read a few articles and books on mediation, and to speak to counsel about mediation styles that they and their clients preferred. I became quite aware that the traditional judicial approach in mandated family law settlement conferences was not always welcome as it was often too evaluative and too judicially controlled.
It was then necessary for me to learn what was expected of a family law mediator and so I attended a mediation course presented by Richard Shields, Antoinette Clark and Darlene Murphy. They stressed the requirement of the neutrality of a mediator in the process, the necessity of hearing from each party as well as their counsel, and of the importance of ensuring that each party is capable of negotiating towards a settlement without any duress or fear of future physical or emotional harm.
Generally speaking, the mediator’s task is to encourage constant communication between all parties, without judging the validity of their positions. A mediator is meant to help the parties narrow their differences and to encourage them to make offers to settle with a view to enabling them to ultimately settle their differences.
I discussed my future with a few friends, lawyers and colleagues and concluded that it would be wise to join a law firm which supported the use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). The late Eugene Fedak, a retired Superior Court Justice encouraged me to contact the firm Ross & McBride LLP, with which he was then associated as a mediator. I then met with Andrew Spurgeon, a partner of Ross & McBride, who encouraged me to practice mediation of family law and estate issues, in association with the firm.
When I turned seventy-five years old on November 21, 2012, I ceased to be a judge. Within a few days, I commenced an associative relationship with Ross & McBride. Some short time later, I also became an associate with the ADR Chambers in Toronto and joined the ADR Institute of Ontario.
I have been now working as a mediator for over three years. My sessions with Shields, Clark and Murphy were very helpful to me as I was developing my mediation skills.
Here are some useful skills and ideas developed in my time as a mediator that I can share:
In short, the mediation process is a way to expeditiously resolve family disputes. For parties who are not wealthy, it is appropriate to pursue mediation where settlement discussion are breaking down. Husbands and wives might insist that their counsel consider mediation where they have some confidence that all of the material necessary to settle a case can be or has been produced. It also may sometimes be appropriate to consider mediating a matter in the middle of a court proceeding.
Prepared by The Honourable David M. Steinberg
Assisted by Meredith Baker
To learn conflict resolution skills that you can use at work and in your personal life, please visit our Alternative Dispute Resolution Workshop page to learn more about upcoming in-person and instructor-led online sessions.
To improve your negotiation skills and get the results you want while negotiating, please visit our Become a Powerful Negotiator Workshop page to learn more about upcoming in-person and instructor-led online sessions.
To gain skills to handle difficult conversations and difficult people with confidence, please visit our Dealing With Difficult People Workshop page to learn more about upcoming in-person and instructor-led online sessions.
We are a Canadian company that offers professional development programs around the world. The Stitt Feld Handy Group is a division of ADR Chambers, one of the largest providers of dispute resolution services in the world.